Cloud Transformation
Cloud transformation that changes how your systems run, not just where they are hosted
We move your workloads to AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, modernise the applications that cannot scale as they are and put every environment under Terraform and delivery pipelines. The result is a platform whose capacity follows demand, whose costs are tagged to an owner and which your own engineers can run.
Infrastructure that scales with demand.
The problem
The problem it solves
Cloud transformation is the programme of moving applications and data to a platform such as AWS, Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud and changing how they are built, deployed and operated once there. It combines migration, application modernisation, infrastructure as code, automated delivery, observability and cost governance, so the organisation gains elastic capacity rather than a rented copy of its old data centre.
Many organisations are already partly in the cloud yet still run it like a server room: hand-built environments, fixed capacity sized for the worst day and bills that grow with no clear owner. Others are on ageing hardware or a hosting contract that limits what the product can do. Moving servers alone changes the invoice, not the way the business operates.
- 01Capacity is sized for peak demand all year, so you pay for idle servers most days and still struggle on the busiest ones.
- 02Environments were built by hand in a console, and nobody can recreate production with confidence after an incident.
- 03Applications assume a single server, local disk or a fixed IP address, which blocks autoscaling and managed services.
- 04An earlier lift-and-shift moved the problems along with the servers, and the cloud bill rose without any gain in resilience.
- 05Each team or supplier opened its own cloud account, so networks overlap, logging differs and nobody has a single view of the estate.
- 06Nothing is tagged by product or environment, so the monthly invoice cannot be split between teams and idle test resources run all weekend.
Who it is for
Built for teams like yours
Organisations on ageing on-premises servers
Teams facing a hardware refresh, an expiring data centre or colocation contract, or servers past vendor support, who want the move to change more than the hosting bill.
Growing SaaS and digital product companies
Products that have outgrown a single VPS or shared hosting plan and now need autoscaling, separate environments and infrastructure engineers can change through pull requests.
Businesses already in the cloud but running it by hand
Companies whose AWS, Azure or Google Cloud estate was assembled in the console over several years and now suffers from drift, rising costs and few people who understand it.
Organisations with regional or data residency needs
Businesses serving the UK, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia or wider markets that need workloads in specific regions with clear account, network and access boundaries.
Solution architecture
How it fits together
We design the target platform as layers that can be built, reviewed and changed independently. Foundations come first, because every workload that lands later inherits their identity, network and logging decisions.
- 01
Landing zone and account structure
Separate accounts, subscriptions or projects for production, non-production and shared services, with central identity, guardrail policies, billing tags and audit logging enabled from the first day.
- 02
Network and connectivity
Private subnets, controlled ingress through load balancers and Nginx, private endpoints to managed services and, during the transition, VPN links back to systems that remain on-premises.
- 03
Compute and application runtime
Each workload on the runtime that suits it: Docker containers on Kubernetes for services that scale independently, managed app platforms for simpler web applications, functions for event-driven jobs and virtual machines only where software requires them.
- 04
Data and storage
Managed PostgreSQL, MySQL or MongoDB with automated backups and point-in-time recovery, object storage with lifecycle rules, and Redis caching where read load justifies it.
- 05
Delivery and automation
Terraform for every resource, GitHub Actions pipelines for application and infrastructure changes, and reviewed pull requests as the only route into production.
- 06
Monitoring, budgets and alerts
Central logs, metrics and alerts, budget alerts per product or team, scheduled shutdown of non-production environments and regular right-sizing based on measured usage.
Workflow
From request to result
- 01
Estate and objectives review
We inventory applications, data stores, dependencies and current costs, and agree what the programme must achieve: elastic scaling, resilience, lower spend, data residency or faster releases.
- 02
Provider choice and migration sequence
We choose the provider and regions, design the landing zone and decide for each workload whether to rehost, replatform, refactor or retire it, then group dependent systems into waves.
- 03
Landing zone built in Terraform
The account structure, networking, identity and delivery pipelines are written in Terraform and reviewed with your engineers before any production workload moves.
- 04
Migrate and modernise in waves
Workloads move in small groups, starting with a low-risk one. Each wave has testing, a rehearsed cutover and a rollback path, and modernisation such as containerisation happens where it pays back.
- 05
Right-size and transfer ownership
We tune autoscaling and instance sizes from real usage, write runbooks and alerts, and pair with your engineers until they lead the final waves and run the platform day to day.
Capabilities
What the solution includes
Portfolio assessment and target costing
A workload-by-workload view of effort, risk and expected monthly cost on the target cloud, built from your inventory and usage data rather than a generic pricing calculator.
Wave-based migration and cutover
Dependent systems moved together in planned waves, with data verified before and after transfer, cutovers rehearsed in advance and the old environment kept available until each wave is accepted.
Removing single-server assumptions
Sessions moved to Redis, uploads to object storage, configuration and secrets to managed stores and scheduled jobs off individual hosts, so an application can run as several instances behind a load balancer.
Environments built from shared modules
Every account, network, database, cluster and permission defined in Terraform modules, so staging is built from the same code as production and a new region or test stack comes from the same pipeline.
Multi-zone design and load-tested scaling
Workloads spread across availability zones, with health checks, scaling policies tuned from load tests and backups restored on a schedule to prove they work.
FinOps controls in code
Tagging standards enforced in Terraform, budgets and alerts per product, scheduled shutdown of idle environments, right-sizing reviews and reserved capacity bought only once demand is predictable.
Preventive guardrails
Organisation-level policies that block public storage buckets, unencrypted volumes and resources in unapproved regions, alongside least-privilege roles, secrets in a managed vault and central audit logs.
Cloud operating model
Written ownership for accounts, budgets, patching, on-call and access requests, so product teams know what they can change themselves and what the platform owner approves.
Benefits
What changes for your organisation
Capacity that follows demand
Services scale out for busy periods and back in afterwards, so you stop paying all year for the busiest day.
Environments you can rebuild
Because infrastructure lives in code, replacing a lost environment, opening a new region or creating a fresh test stack is handled by the pipeline from code you already have.
Spend you can explain
Tagged resources and per-team budgets show what each product costs, and regular right-sizing keeps that figure honest.
Production changes with a review trail
Pipelines replace console access to production, so each infrastructure change is reviewed, tested and can be reverted from version history.
Less time on hardware and patching
Managed databases, storage and runtimes take over backups, failover and much of the routine patching that used to fill your team's week.
A platform your engineers can operate
Documentation, runbooks and paired delivery on later waves mean your engineers can operate and extend the platform after handover.
Technology
Technology stack
Cloud platforms
- AWS
- Microsoft Azure
- Google Cloud
Automation and delivery
- Terraform
- GitHub Actions
- Helm
Runtime
- Docker
- Kubernetes
- Nginx
- Linux
Data and monitoring
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Redis
- Prometheus
- Grafana
Delivered through
Services behind this solution
Related industries
Cloud Transformation FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Cloud migration moves workloads from one place to another, while cloud transformation also changes how they are built, deployed, scaled and paid for once they arrive. A migration can be finished when traffic switches over. A transformation is finished when infrastructure is defined in code, releases run through pipelines, capacity follows demand and each team can see what its services cost. Migration is usually one stream of work inside a transformation, alongside modernisation, automation and changes to how the platform is operated.
Choose on commercial and organisational fit rather than feature lists, because all three can run typical business workloads. The deciding factors are usually existing agreements and licences, such as Microsoft licences that may be reusable on Azure, the skills your engineers and local hiring market already have, regions available where your data must stay, and support from the vendors of packaged software you run. We cost your real workloads on the shortlisted providers and give you a written comparison of running cost, migration effort and risk.
A landing zone is the prepared foundation every workload moves into: account or subscription structure, identity and access, networking, logging, security guardrails and billing tags. It is built first because each workload inherits those decisions, and changing them after dozens of services depend on them is slow and risky. We define the landing zone in Terraform, review it with your team and prove it with a low-risk workload before the main migration waves begin.
We decide per application by weighing its business value, how often it changes and what currently stops it scaling, rather than applying one rule to the whole estate. Stable software that nobody is developing is usually rehosted or retired. Applications that mainly need a managed database or container runtime are replatformed. Refactoring is kept for products that change often and are held back by single-server design. Packaged software follows its vendor's supported options. Each decision is recorded with its reasoning so it can be revisited in a later wave.
FinOps is the practice of making cloud spending visible, owned and regularly optimised, and it belongs in a transformation from the start rather than after the first surprising bill. In practice that means tagging every resource by product and environment, setting budgets with alerts, shutting down non-production outside working hours, right-sizing from real usage and committing to reserved capacity only once demand is stable. We set these controls up in code and hand over a monthly review routine your team can run.
Yes, and in a phased transformation some systems usually stay on-premises for a while, or permanently. The main risk is splitting components that talk to each other constantly, such as an application and its database, across a VPN link where every query adds latency. We map those dependencies and move tightly coupled components in the same wave. The two sides are joined by site-to-site VPN or private connectivity, with one identity provider for both and monitoring on the link itself.
We deploy workloads, backups, logs and disaster recovery copies only to cloud regions that satisfy your residency obligations, and we enforce that choice with policy rather than convention. Guardrails can block resources from being created in unapproved regions, and storage replication is configured to stay within the permitted boundary. For UK workloads we design with UK GDPR in mind. For workloads in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere we follow the requirements set by your legal or compliance advisers, and confirm provider region availability during design.
We load test the new platform before go-live and watch what fails first, which is often not the web tier. Common culprits are database connection limits reached as application instances multiply, scaling rules that react too slowly to a sudden spike, and caches that start empty after each deployment. We tune those from the test results, check that capacity scales back in afterwards so spend falls with traffic, and add saturation alerts so limits can be raised before users notice.
We apply preventive guardrails at the organisation level, so risky resources are blocked when someone tries to create them rather than found in a later review. On AWS that means service control policies, on Azure it means Azure Policy, and on Google Cloud organisation policies. Typical rules deny public storage buckets, unencrypted disks and resources in unapproved regions. Terraform changes are also checked in the pull request, and anything created outside the pipeline is reported through central audit logging.
The length of a cloud transformation is set mainly by how many workloads move, how much refactoring each needs, how much data must be transferred and how quickly your organisation approves cutovers. Because we work in waves, value arrives before the programme ends. For a small, well-defined estate, the landing zone and a first low-risk workload can typically be in production a few weeks after discovery. Larger estates continue wave by wave, with a working environment or migrated workload to review every one to two weeks.
The cost is driven by how many workloads move, how much modernisation each one needs, data transfer effort and any compliance requirements you must work within. After a short discovery you receive a fixed quote for the landing zone and first wave, and later waves are quoted once their scope is clear. Separately, we estimate the monthly running cost of the target design, including reserved capacity and non-production schedules, so you can compare it with what you pay for hosting today.
Your organisation does, under an operating model we agree in writing before handover. It names who owns each account and budget, who approves new resources, who patches and upgrades managed services and who is on call. Your engineers review our pull requests from the start, pair with us on middle waves and lead the final ones, so they have changed the platform before they own it. Handover adds architecture diagrams and incident runbooks, and ongoing operations support from us is available if you want it.
Explore other solutions. Each combines AI, software and cloud services around a specific outcome.
Start your project
Tell us what you're building.
Share the problem, the systems involved and where you want to be. A senior engineer replies with honest advice on scope, architecture and the fastest safe path to production.